.Net Processes - Facilitate Parallel Execution of LocalProcess#9463
Merged
.Net Processes - Facilitate Parallel Execution of LocalProcess#9463
Conversation
esttenorio
reviewed
Oct 29, 2024
esttenorio
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
Contributor
esttenorio
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the beauty of a powerful 1 line change
alliscode
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
When using
async/await, there is no guarantee that the method will actually run asynchronously. The internal implementation is free to return using a completely synchronous path.Description
Add
Task.Yield()when startingLocalProcessto encourage the use of a separate sychronization context from the current one.Contribution Checklist