-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
Description
Overview
Create dt-rpi-research-context.instructions.md — a DT-aware instruction file that auto-loads when task-researcher operates on DT artifacts. This frames research activities around DT methods, stakeholder needs, and empathy-driven inquiry rather than pure technical research patterns.
When task-researcher receives a handoff from the DT coach (via Problem Space exit), this instruction file helps the researcher understand that:
- The research question comes from a DT process, not a technical spec
- Stakeholder perspectives drive the research framing
- Findings should feed back into the DT framework (validated/assumed/unknown markers)
- The researcher may need to return findings to the DT coach rather than proceeding to planning
Directory context: The
.copilot-tracking/dt/path inapplyTois created per-project by the coach agent (#579 from Phase 2). See #583 for directory structure and handoff contract details.
Target File
.github/instructions/dt-rpi-research-context.instructions.md
Frontmatter
---
description: 'DT-aware task-researcher context — frames research around DT methods, stakeholder needs, and empathy-driven inquiry'
applyTo: '**/.copilot-tracking/dt/**'
---Required Content
Research Framing Adjustments
When operating in DT context, task-researcher adjusts its approach:
| Standard Research | DT-Informed Research |
|---|---|
| Focus on technical feasibility | Focus on stakeholder impact and technical feasibility |
| Single-perspective analysis | Multi-stakeholder analysis |
| Binary findings (works/doesn't) | Quality-marked findings (validated/assumed/unknown/conflicting) |
| Forward-only output | Output may return to DT coach for further coaching |
| Code-centric results | Human-centric results with code implications |
DT-Specific Research Patterns
- Stakeholder-driven queries: When the research question mentions stakeholders, investigate from multiple stakeholder perspectives
- Assumption validation: When the handoff artifact flags "assumed" items, prioritize validating or invalidating those assumptions
- Gap investigation: When the handoff artifact flags "unknown" items, these become primary research targets
- Empathy data synthesis: Process qualitative research data (interview themes, observation patterns) alongside quantitative data
- Industry context integration: If an industry context template was used during coaching, reference it for domain-specific terminology and constraints
Output Format Additions
Task-researcher adds DT-specific sections to research output when operating in DT context:
- Assumption Validation Results: For each "assumed" item from the handoff, provide evidence status
- Gap Resolution: For each "unknown" item, provide findings or recommend continued investigation
- Stakeholder Impact Assessment: How research findings affect different stakeholder groups
- DT Coach Return Recommendation: Whether findings warrant returning to DT coaching before proceeding to planning
Return Path Awareness
Task-researcher should recommend returning to DT coaching when:
- Research reveals that the problem statement needs significant revision
- New stakeholders are discovered that weren't in the original map
- Fundamental assumptions are invalidated
- Conflicting evidence suggests the synthesis (Method 3) needs rework
Token Budget
Target: ~500-700 tokens (ambient tier — auto-loads on all DT artifact paths)
RPI Pipeline Workflow
- task-researcher: Review existing task-researcher agent definition and behavioral patterns. Understand how
applyToglobs modify researcher behavior. Gather DT research framing from cumulative research. - task-planner: Plan the file — research framing adjustments, DT-specific patterns, output additions, return path triggers.
- task-implementor: Author following prompt-builder standards. Adjustments should augment (not replace) standard researcher behavior.
- task-reviewer: Validate against DT review context (feat(instructions): Create dt-rpi-review-context.instructions.md #593), confirm research framing adjustments, prompt-builder compliance.
Success Criteria
- Instruction file created at
.github/instructions/dt-rpi-research-context.instructions.md - Frontmatter has
applyTo: '**/.copilot-tracking/dt/**'glob - Research framing adjustments defined (stakeholder-driven, multi-perspective, quality-marked)
- DT-specific research patterns cover assumption validation, gap investigation, empathy data synthesis
- Output format additions include assumption validation results and stakeholder impact
- Return path triggers defined (problem statement revision, new stakeholders, invalidated assumptions)
- Token count within ~500-700 target
- Passes task-reviewer validation against prompt-builder standards
- Each prompt, instructions, or agent file registered in
collections/design-thinking.collection.ymlwithpathandkindfields - Each prompt, instructions, or agent file registered in
collections/hve-core-all.collection.ymlwithpathandkindfields -
npm run plugin:generatesucceeds after collection manifest updates
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status