-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 421
Closed
Labels
area-AppContainerTopics related to AppContainer in Windows App SDK (packaged apps in partial trust environments etc.)Topics related to AppContainer in Windows App SDK (packaged apps in partial trust environments etc.)area-PackagingTopics related to packaging behavior of Windows App SDKTopics related to packaging behavior of Windows App SDKdiscussion
Description
Discussion: Decouple MSIX from AppContainer
Currently, there is no way to run an app in an AppContainer without it being packaged into an MSIX. This has a few major downsides:
- Slow inner loop. VS has to do the loose file deployment every time you build/F5.
- Can't run an app container app from the command line.
It would be great if MSIX was solely a technology for packaging and submitting apps to the store (or sideloading), and didn't have an impact on the runtime behavior of the app.
With Project Reunion and WinUI3, we now are trying to support 3 different app models:
- Packaged Desktop
- Unpackaged Desktop
- Packaged UWP
It would make tooling simpler to just have a single build/deploy model for all of these.
Related Links
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
area-AppContainerTopics related to AppContainer in Windows App SDK (packaged apps in partial trust environments etc.)Topics related to AppContainer in Windows App SDK (packaged apps in partial trust environments etc.)area-PackagingTopics related to packaging behavior of Windows App SDKTopics related to packaging behavior of Windows App SDKdiscussion