Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As kindly initiated by Illner via #58 . This seems to fix the issue:
c o Ganak SHA1: a8904ce
c o Arjun SHA1: 58ec9aff687c9adcd6a26f158a947c07794e43f6
c o SBVA SHA1: 0faa08cf3cc26ed855831c9dc16a3489c9ae010f
c o CMS SHA1: b09bd6bf05253adf5981e44f9dbd374b2811ff94
c o ApproxMC SHA1: 56042dc9002dee312bb4be283d2bdf8bc2a67827
c o CadiBack a35c4b98b6237b16ca0fd08dded8f8f51ff998a8
c o CaDiCaL 81de5d2b5c68727b4d183ec5ceb56561f1b3b6e1
The output is now:
This seems to have slightly less components (old one was 4290630K).
With
--td 0we get a MUCH faster count:Notice that the count is good, even though the delta is kinda high (3 in 1000 chance of wrong count)