💖 Thanks for opening this pull request! 💖
Here is a list of things that will help get it across the finish line: - If this is a new or updated CSS interactive example, please ensure that you followed the CSS styleguide - If this is a new or updated JavaScript interactive example, please ensure that you followed the JavaScript styleguide - If your changes affects any of the steps in our contribution docs, please also make the relevant changes there.

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉🎉🎉

Thanks @wbamberg.

What is this for? I didn't see this in the style guide and I'm curious. Also, since class is ES6, const or let should be used, right?

As I understand it, the old example incorrectly used a class statement:

class Thing {
}

rather than a class expression:

var Thing = class {
}

Also, since class is ES6, const or let should be used, right?

I did consider this, but the other examples in the page use var, and it's not like var is outlawed in ES6, it just isn't the only option any more. Looking at the style guide, I see it says:

ES6 examples should use: ... let and const instead of var

...which now seems a little overly-prescriptive. Still, perhaps this should be changed to const.

Ahh I see, that makes sense.

I think var is still okay for ES6 examples since anyone using ES6 will be exposed to it often enough that either works but was just checking.

Ah, I see the documentation on declaring with let or const fitting the ES6 patterns. Maybe the examples and page could be updated?

I would accept a PR to change var to let[1] here. But personally I think it's OK as it is too. var is still a legitimate way to declare variables in some situations, and without more context, you can't say that the example should definitely use let.

[1] Probably not to const though, because one of the main differences between class expressions and class statements is that with class expressions you can redefine the variable, and if you use const you can't do this. At least that's my understanding, I'm not very familiar with these APIs.

Inertia it is. I think we get the same error Identifier 'c' has already been declared.