Acceptance Criteria
For folks helping with Firefox related documentation
Features to document
Needs addition to experimental features page.
See Other for further research.
Related Gecko bugs
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1740530
Other
So this allows you to apply colours, gradients etc to a font.
This is behind gfx.font_rendering.colr_v1.enabled. So minimally add to experimental features.
So this basically is support for using the colr v1 fonts in @font-face and `FontFace (i.e. using fonts that have color gradients etc). From the point of our existing docs we don't say very much about the different font tables and types of fonts and I don't think we need to. However we do need to indicate support for these features.
What has to be done is add the supported tables like colrv1 to BCD. Not all of them though, just the ones that can be feature checked in the @font-face src: descriptor's tech(...) syntax that FF is adding in #19833. This makes sense because tech() provides a fallback to a small subset, which are likely therefore to be the ones that have compatibility issues.
I don't think there is any particular need for docs on this though.
Acceptance Criteria
For folks helping with Firefox related documentation
dev-doc-completeor
Features to document
Needs addition to experimental features page.
See Other for further research.
Related Gecko bugs
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1740530
Other
So this allows you to apply colours, gradients etc to a font.
This is behind
gfx.font_rendering.colr_v1.enabled. So minimally add to experimental features.So this basically is support for using the colr v1 fonts in
@font-faceand `FontFace (i.e. using fonts that have color gradients etc). From the point of our existing docs we don't say very much about the different font tables and types of fonts and I don't think we need to. However we do need to indicate support for these features.What has to be done is add the supported tables like colrv1 to BCD. Not all of them though, just the ones that can be feature checked in the
@font-facesrc: descriptor'stech(...)syntax that FF is adding in #19833. This makes sense because tech() provides a fallback to a small subset, which are likely therefore to be the ones that have compatibility issues.I don't think there is any particular need for docs on this though.