Remove the function call overhead of repeatedly calling list.append().

% ruff check --select=PERF --output-format=concise

mavsdk/camera.py:2188:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/camera.py:2453:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/camera.py:2513:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/component_information.py:363:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/log_files.py:308:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/mission_raw.py:788:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/mission_raw.py:817:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/mission_raw.py:846:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
mavsdk/tune.py:253:13: PERF401 Use a list comprehension to create a transformed list
Found 9 errors.

% ruff rule PERF401

manual-list-comprehension (PERF401)

Derived from the Perflint linter.

Fix is sometimes available.

What it does

Checks for for loops that can be replaced by a list comprehension.

Why is this bad?

When creating a transformed list from an existing list using a for-loop,
prefer a list comprehension. List comprehensions are more readable and
more performant.

Using the below as an example, the list comprehension is ~10% faster on
Python 3.11, and ~25% faster on Python 3.10.

Note that, as with all perflint rules, this is only intended as a
micro-optimization, and will have a negligible impact on performance in
most cases.

Example

original = list(range(10000))
filtered = []
for i in original:
    if i % 2:
        filtered.append(i)

Use instead:

original = list(range(10000))
filtered = [x for x in original if x % 2]

If you're appending to an existing list, use the extend method instead:

original = list(range(10000))
filtered.extend(x for x in original if x % 2)