Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.02%. Comparing base (b94f00f) to head (ec97a02).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on v3.0.x.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           v3.0.x    #4153      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.96%   67.02%   -1.94%     
==========================================
  Files         446      446              
  Lines       22984    22324     -660     
==========================================
- Hits        15851    14963     -888     
- Misses       7133     7361     +228     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I have no idea why the code coverage would change for this PR. It does not touch the source or tests.

Based on https://github.com/jawg/docker-mapnik3 and jawg/docker-mapnik3#8. Usage of Apache licensed software (the image build instructions in this case) should be fine if the Apache License is mentioned explicitly (it is in this PR).

This PR should fix #3704.

Travis integration is still needed: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/docker/#building-a-docker-image-from-a-dockerfile

The Python and Node bindings could have their own Docker image which also compile those bindings into a derived image.

Each 'main' branch of the project should have it's own image, in particular each release.

Many thanks for the Dockerfile. Did you test to include the python-bindings in the Dockerimage? I have tried, but did not suceed so far.

Here's a (tested) Dockerfile that adds python-bindings to mapnik3 docker from jawg.