Hmmmm.... the checks fail because of a formatting error. Curiously, the formatting error that the check found was not what I committed, as is visible in the changed files section.

i agree the lint check reports are confusing, but it's in a diff format (+/-).

Here it is formatted in github markdown (it's complaining about a line being too long):

-        if ["proposed", "abandoned", "subway", "construction", "razed"].contains(&railway_type.as_str()) {
+        if ["proposed", "abandoned", "subway", "construction", "razed"]
+            .contains(&railway_type.as_str())
+        {
             return;
         }

other than that, the change looks good :)

Oh, so the lines marked with + are how it should be! Do I understand correct that I should change it to the way the check suggested?

Oh, so the lines marked with + are how it should be! Do I understand correct that I should change it to the way the check suggested?

yup that will make the check pass :)

Thanks for the clarification! Changed it. ✔

While exploring, I noticed that the value "turntable" should probably also not be rendered. Added it.

Thanks a lot for your contribution! :)

nasıl haritayı açıp seçecez