Skip to content

🔧 chore(memory): analysis action icon not aligned#13160

Merged
nekomeowww merged 1 commit into
canaryfrom
neko/dev/ui-memory-analysis-not-aligned
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

🔧 chore(memory): analysis action icon not aligned#13160
nekomeowww merged 1 commit into
canaryfrom
neko/dev/ui-memory-analysis-not-aligned

Conversation

@nekomeowww

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

💻 Change Type

  • ✨ feat
  • 🐛 fix
  • ♻️ refactor
  • 💄 style
  • 👷 build
  • ⚡️ perf
  • ✅ test
  • 📝 docs
  • 🔨 chore

🔗 Related Issue

🔀 Description of Change

🧪 How to Test

  • Tested locally
  • Added/updated tests
  • No tests needed

📸 Screenshots / Videos

Before After
... ...

📝 Additional Information

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
lobehub Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 20, 2026 1:05pm

Request Review

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've reviewed this pull request using the Sourcery rules engine

@lobehubbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ONLY-yours - This is a memory feature UI fix (icon alignment). Please take a look.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 391fb6f83f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +56 to +60
<ActionIcon
icon={CalendarClockIcon}
size={DESKTOP_HEADER_ICON_SIZE}
tooltipProps={{ placement: 'bottom' }}
onClick={() => setOpen(true)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore loading guard on icon-only analysis trigger

The iconOnly path no longer passes loading={loading} to ActionIcon, which regresses the interaction guard during task-state fetches. In MemoryAnalysis, showAction is intentionally true while task data is still undefined, so this button can appear before we know whether an analysis task is already running; without the loading state, users can click through and submit a duplicate extraction request in that window. Please keep the loading binding here to preserve the previous disabled behavior until validation completes.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.60%. Comparing base (04f963d) to head (391fb6f).
⚠️ Report is 22 commits behind head on canary.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           canary   #13160     +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   74.60%   74.60%             
=========================================
  Files        1514     1514             
  Lines      124476   124476             
  Branches    13790    16459   +2669     
=========================================
  Hits        92862    92862             
  Misses      31503    31503             
  Partials      111      111             
Flag Coverage Δ
app 67.68% <ø> (ø)
database 97.89% <ø> (ø)
packages/agent-runtime 89.60% <ø> (ø)
packages/context-engine 83.53% <ø> (ø)
packages/conversation-flow 92.37% <ø> (ø)
packages/file-loaders 87.02% <ø> (ø)
packages/memory-user-memory 66.68% <ø> (ø)
packages/model-bank 99.84% <ø> (ø)
packages/model-runtime 84.72% <ø> (ø)
packages/prompts 74.60% <ø> (ø)
packages/python-interpreter 92.90% <ø> (ø)
packages/ssrf-safe-fetch 0.00% <ø> (ø)
packages/utils 90.09% <ø> (ø)
packages/web-crawler 88.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
Store 66.25% <ø> (ø)
Services 49.90% <ø> (ø)
Server 69.88% <ø> (ø)
Libs 42.20% <ø> (ø)
Utils 91.09% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nekomeowww nekomeowww merged commit 88935d8 into canary Mar 20, 2026
34 of 35 checks passed
@nekomeowww nekomeowww deleted the neko/dev/ui-memory-analysis-not-aligned branch March 20, 2026 13:39
@lobehubbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

❤️ Great PR @nekomeowww ❤️

The growth of project is inseparable from user feedback and contribution, thanks for your contribution! If you are interesting with the lobehub developer community, please join our discord and then dm @arvinxx or @canisminor1990. They will invite you to our private developer channel. We are talking about the lobe-chat development or sharing ai newsletter around the world.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants