-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Consider using full GH runner in CI #865
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
D1-featureA new feature, a piece of functionality that needs to be developedA new feature, a piece of functionality that needs to be developedI2-mediumshould be completed within 10 working daysshould be completed within 10 working days
Description
Context
We are using self-hosted runner to build docker images in our CI so far, see:
#259
#393
#409
the main reason is self-hosted runner is much faster than GH-runner: ~20m vs 1h
But now self-hosted runner needs 40min as well to build the docker image (mostly because of polkadot update that introduces more compilation deps).
Maybe it's worth checking again how long the compilation on GH-runner would be and switch to it when possible. It will help concurrent CI runs.
✔️ Please set appropriate labels and assignees if applicable.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
D1-featureA new feature, a piece of functionality that needs to be developedA new feature, a piece of functionality that needs to be developedI2-mediumshould be completed within 10 working daysshould be completed within 10 working days