Conversation
|
Looks great! A few comments, the only serious one is about |
AndrewJakubowicz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! Just some minor clarifying comments.
augustjk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor suggestions. Overall LGTM.
Co-authored-by: Augustine Kim <ajk830@gmail.com>
|
Thank you @justinfagnani! Applied your changes. Also ignore the failing CLA. It is not able to figure out personal GitHub emails. |
Co-authored-by: Justin Fagnani <justinfagnani@google.com>
6867d39 to
dd5d4e6
Compare
|
Fixed CLA issue by amending commit and force pushing |
|
LGTM on allo changes! |
Co-authored-by: Justin Fagnani <justinfagnani@google.com>
3fc6dbf to
30ee537
Compare
sorvell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should be updated based on the review of lit/lit#4895.
|
@sorvell what needs to be updated? This mentions the plan of record that lit/lit#4895 implements, which is to use property options: https://github.com/lit/rfcs/pull/20/files#diff-a406be4bc64f6899edff250e261c51903172e65fe84a676f1dcac6c63c153dbaR119 |
Nice, I missed that part. |
|
Excited for this change - thanks for the continuous improvements!
Regarding bundle size:
Very interested in this - could you provide more details on how that may look like and what the tradeoff is? For reference, this is what we are doing at build time at present:
Obviously, once |
No description provided.