Add a small note about type checking context#1134
Conversation
I didn't want to go into the full details because it felt like it would disrupt the flow of this page, and the main information that people need to know is that we're not type checking private or protected fields.
|
A live preview of this PR will be available at the URL(s) below. https://pr1134-31657ae---lit-dev-5ftespv5na-uc.a.run.app/ |
AndrewJakubowicz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like it - I'm a little torn about whether it's worth adding the comment as I'm not sure how many will see it and who is the audience.
Maybe the comment should be rephrased as a TODO linking to the issue so we can update docs when the situation changes?
|
Yeah, the comment is there for maintainers of the site, not for visitors. Clarified into a TODO Thanks for the review! |
I didn't want to go into the full details because it felt like it would disrupt the flow of this page, and the main information that people need to know is that we're not type checking private or protected fields.