Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#187
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#187
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/linxGnu/grocksdb/security/code-scanning/1
The fix for this issue is to add a
permissionsblock to the workflow file, specifying only the minimal privileges necessary for the workflow to function correctly. For a typical Go CI workflow that checks out code, fetches dependencies, runs tests, and posts coverage to Coveralls, the default permission required iscontents: read, unless any step actually writes to the repository, issues, or pull requests (e.g., commenting on PRs). Coveralls can comment on pull requests if so configured, but if not, onlycontents: readis generally sufficient. The best approach is to addpermissions: contents: readat the workflow root (just aftername: CI), which will apply to all jobs unless further permissions are specified for particular jobs. If analysis of the workflow finds that it needs additional permissions (e.g., for commenting on PRs), you can extend the block or add more granular permissions to the relevant job. For now, add the minimal configuration at the root of.github/workflows/go.yml.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.