Skip to content

new FAQ entry on license #480

@cmungall

Description

@cmungall

We should have an FAQ entry in general about terms of use

Of course, the actual LICENSE itself should be completely unambioguous and normative, but it can be useful to have an informative FAQ entry that emphasizes commitment to openness and unrestrictedness

Note: wait until we have reached clarity here first: linkml/linkml-runtime#69

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

documentationImprovements or additions to documentationstaleInactive issue pending closure

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions