Skip to content

Migration to lightbend repo#510

Closed
2m wants to merge 1 commit intolightbend:masterfrom
2m:wip-lightbend-2m
Closed

Migration to lightbend repo#510
2m wants to merge 1 commit intolightbend:masterfrom
2m:wip-lightbend-2m

Conversation

@2m
Copy link
Contributor

@2m 2m commented Oct 16, 2017

Fixing the fallout after #509

Copy link
Contributor

@ktoso ktoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks, let's create the gitter channel

README.md Outdated

- use the
[checkValid() method](http://typesafehub.github.io/config/latest/api/com/typesafe/config/Config.html#checkValid-com.typesafe.config.Config-java.lang.String...-)
[checkValid() method](http://lghtbend.github.io/config/latest/api/com/typesafe/config/Config.html#checkValid-com.typesafe.config.Config-java.lang.String...-)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lghtbend.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for catching.

@2m 2m force-pushed the wip-lightbend-2m branch 2 times, most recently from 657a2e3 to 632bd07 Compare October 17, 2017 14:38
@dwijnand
Copy link
Contributor

There's a lot more than 26 instances:

$ git show-ref HEAD
08f5a6020ea0770440529ff9d0e2191c72367bec refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
$ git grep typesafehub | wc -l
      65

@2m
Copy link
Contributor Author

2m commented Oct 17, 2017

Thanks for noticing. IntelliJ did not replace all of the occurences. And there is something strange with this PR where it does not show the new commits I pushed to the branch. I will reopen this PR.

@2m 2m closed this Oct 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants