Skip to content

Clarify SetRecords behaviour#187

Merged
mholt merged 1 commit intolibdns:masterfrom
gucci-on-fleek:docs-clarify-SetRecords
Aug 13, 2025
Merged

Clarify SetRecords behaviour#187
mholt merged 1 commit intolibdns:masterfrom
gucci-on-fleek:docs-clarify-SetRecords

Conversation

@gucci-on-fleek
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Some implementations implement SetRecords and AppendRecords identically, but this is incorrect. This commit updates the SetRecords documentation to clarify that SetRecords can only be implemented by a combination of DeleteRecords and AppendRecords, not AppendRecords alone.

Fixes #186.

Some implementations implement `SetRecords` and `AppendRecords`
identically, but this is incorrect. This commit updates the `SetRecords`
documentation to clarify that `SetRecords` can only be implemented by a
combination of `DeleteRecords` and `AppendRecords`, not `AppendRecords`
alone.

Fixes libdns#186.
@gucci-on-fleek gucci-on-fleek requested a review from mholt August 9, 2025 09:39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mholt mholt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! As usual, this is more thorough than I would have done myself, haha. But I think this is great.

@mholt mholt merged commit 6071c1f into libdns:master Aug 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Most implementations missing deletion behavior for SetRecords

2 participants