Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

The Banach open mapping theorem#897

Closed
sgouezel wants to merge 2 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
sgouezel:open_mapping
Closed

The Banach open mapping theorem#897
sgouezel wants to merge 2 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
sgouezel:open_mapping

Conversation

@sgouezel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@sgouezel sgouezel commented Apr 7, 2019

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

@sgouezel sgouezel requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2019 12:32
@robertylewis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Just for the record, this is superseded by #900 and is open for testing purposes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@avigad avigad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me.

@avigad avigad added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) labels Apr 16, 2019
@avigad avigad removed their assignment Apr 16, 2019
@sgouezel sgouezel closed this Apr 25, 2019
@sgouezel sgouezel deleted the open_mapping branch December 2, 2019 10:36
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants