Remove unnecessary parentheses between ? and : in ternary expressions#396
Merged
laurentlb merged 1 commit intolaurentlb:masterfrom May 13, 2024
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The rules for how
? :parse:?and:is parsed as if grouped (just like( )and{ }), so the parens can always be omitted from the middle expression.? expr :is parsed as if it is one whole binary operator in relation to the expressions on either side of it, according to normal precedence rules, thus?:gets its spot in the precedence table in the spec despite its more complex grammar.