#15788 removed vendor specific content#15919
#15788 removed vendor specific content#15919jhbiggs wants to merge 4 commits intokubernetes:masterfrom
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Deploy preview for kubernetes-io-master-staging ready! Built with commit f1edb1f https://deploy-preview-15919--kubernetes-io-master-staging.netlify.com |
|
/assign @ryanmcginnis |
xiangpengzhao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure if we want to keep the vendor specific content.
/cc @zacharysarah
| {{% capture body %}} | ||
|
|
||
| ## Node Status | ||
| ### Node Status |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should be ## here because the below ### Addresses (and others) are parts of it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure this commit should be part of this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, whoops, sorry, I'll undo the change.
|
My thought was to keep in line with the new style guide i.e. prometheus would be acceptable, but the GKE specific items would not. Possibly keep the linuxacademy CKA classes, but remove the Oracle related items, etc. re: #15576 /cc @zacharysarah |
|
@thecrudge: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jhbiggs. Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
46feb1b to
35e1565
Compare
|
I reviewed @thecrudge 's comment and adjusted the commit accordingly. Please let me know what you think. |
zacharysarah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jhbiggs Thanks for this PR! ✨ Some of the deletions need to remain. (The affiliation of the Linux Academy with the Linux Foundation, as well as the LF's relation to the CNCF aren't obvious but are valid.) Otherwise LGTM.
|
|
||
| * [Getting Started with Kubernetes Clusters on OCI Oracle Kubernetes Engine (OKE) (Learning Library)](https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=44785:50:0:::50:P50_EVENT_ID,P50_COURSE_ID:5935,256) | ||
|
|
||
| * [Google Kubernetes Engine Deep Dive (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/google-cloud-platform/training/course/name/google-kubernetes-engine-deep-dive) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
L32 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@zacharysarah why should L32 remain but L16 go? Both are Linux Academy links.
I actually believe both L32 and L16 should be removed if we're truly trying to be vendor-neutral on the website.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, @jaypipes maybe Im missing where he said L16 should go?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Scratch that, just looked at the commit. Yup, L16 should remain :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Per today's weekly meeting, L16 should go because: even though it's a link from a permissible source, it's a link to third-party content. 😅
Good question, @jaypipes!
|
|
||
| * [Google Kubernetes Engine Deep Dive (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/google-cloud-platform/training/course/name/google-kubernetes-engine-deep-dive) | ||
|
|
||
| * [Helm Deep Dive with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/helm-deep-dive-part-1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
L34 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)
|
|
||
| * [Kubernetes for the Absolute Beginners with Hands-on Labs (KodeKloud)](https://kodekloud.com/p/kubernetes-for-the-absolute-beginners-hands-on) | ||
|
|
||
| * [Kubernetes Fundamentals (LFS258) (The Linux Foundation)](https://training.linuxfoundation.org/training/kubernetes-fundamentals/) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
L46 should remain. (The Linux Foundation is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)
|
|
||
| * [Learn Kubernetes using Interactive Hands-on Scenarios (Katacoda)](https://www.katacoda.com/courses/kubernetes/) | ||
|
|
||
| * [Microservice Applications in Kubernetes - 100% Hands-On Experience (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/devops/training/course/name/learn-microservices-by-doing) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
L60 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)
|
|
||
| * [Monitoring Kubernetes With Prometheus with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/kubernetes-and-prometheus) | ||
|
|
||
| * [Service Mesh with Istio with Hands-On Labs (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/linux/training/course/name/service-mesh-with-istio-part-1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
L64 should remain. (The Linux Academy partners with the Linux Foundation, which is the umbrella foundation for the CNCF.)
|
Thanks for the review @zacharysarah , youre awesome! |
jaypipes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should discuss this :)
|
|
||
| * [Getting Started with Kubernetes Clusters on OCI Oracle Kubernetes Engine (OKE) (Learning Library)](https://apexapps.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=44785:50:0:::50:P50_EVENT_ID,P50_COURSE_ID:5935,256) | ||
|
|
||
| * [Google Kubernetes Engine Deep Dive (Linux Academy)] (https://linuxacademy.com/google-cloud-platform/training/course/name/google-kubernetes-engine-deep-dive) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@zacharysarah why should L32 remain but L16 go? Both are Linux Academy links.
I actually believe both L32 and L16 should be removed if we're truly trying to be vendor-neutral on the website.
|
I added back the links I was pretty sure were agreeable. I'll make another change when you figure out the 16/32 controversy ;) |
|
Holding for the results of the KEP arising from #15748. /hold |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
|
@jhbiggs: PR needs rebase. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
|
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
|
I am closing this PR until a decision has been made about #15748. |
|
@kbhawkey: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fix: Issue #15788
It looks like each link in this page refers to vendor-specific content, so I removed all links. Did you intend to see ALL links removed?