Skip to content

KEP-1432 Move volume health monitoring to beta#3321

Closed
xing-yang wants to merge 4 commits into
kubernetes:masterfrom
xing-yang:volume_health_beta
Closed

KEP-1432 Move volume health monitoring to beta#3321
xing-yang wants to merge 4 commits into
kubernetes:masterfrom
xing-yang:volume_health_beta

Conversation

@xing-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • One-line PR description: Move volume health monitoring to beta
  • Other comments:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory labels May 28, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label May 28, 2022
@xing-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/assign @gnufied

@xing-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/assign @deads2k

Comment thread keps/prod-readiness/sig-storage/1432.yaml
@xing-yang xing-yang force-pushed the volume_health_beta branch from 968dc5e to f4c0345 Compare June 5, 2022 01:06
@xing-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@wojtek-t Addressed your comment. Can you help with PRR review?

Comment thread keps/prod-readiness/sig-storage/1432.yaml Outdated
@xing-yang xing-yang force-pushed the volume_health_beta branch from f4c0345 to af2d1a5 Compare June 9, 2022 00:34
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 9, 2022
@xing-yang xing-yang force-pushed the volume_health_beta branch from af2d1a5 to 78ccf43 Compare June 9, 2022 00:45
@deads2k

deads2k commented Jun 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The detail here is very good, thank you. Approve the PRR, the sig owns /lgtm for the move to beta in this release.

/approve

1 similar comment
@deads2k

deads2k commented Jun 9, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The detail here is very good, thank you. Approve the PRR, the sig owns /lgtm for the move to beta in this release.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, xing-yang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 9, 2022
@Priyankasaggu11929 Priyankasaggu11929 mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2022
8 tasks
@xing-yang xing-yang force-pushed the volume_health_beta branch from 78ccf43 to 230a409 Compare June 24, 2022 02:55
@pohly

pohly commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Have the questions around scalability of this feature from kubernetes-csi/external-health-monitor#91 (comment) been addressed?

@pohly

pohly commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Where are E2E tests for this feature (one of the beta graduation criteria)?

@xing-yang

xing-yang commented Sep 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Where are E2E tests for this feature (one of the beta graduation criteria)?

The e2e tests for this feature is being worked on. This feature will not move to Beta if the e2e tests can't be merged before the KEP merge deadline.
By the way, the e2e test will only be added for the feature on the node side. It will not be added for the feature on the controller side because we can't rely on events in the test as events can disappear. I pointed this out in the KEP as well.

@xing-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Have the questions around scalability of this feature from kubernetes-csi/external-health-monitor#91 (comment) been addressed?

Thanks for the reminder. Someone is working on it but it is not complete yet. This issue is on the controller side.

Comment thread keps/sig-storage/1432-volume-health-monitor/kep.yaml Outdated
Comment thread keps/sig-storage/1432-volume-health-monitor/kep.yaml Outdated
@k8s-triage-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 4, 2023
@xing-yang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 5, 2023
@marosset marosset changed the title Move volume health monitoring to beta KEP-1432 Move volume health monitoring to beta Feb 9, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 10, 2023
@carlory

carlory commented May 17, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 17, 2023

latest-milestone: "v1.24"
stage: "alpha"
latest-milestone: "v1.27"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v1.28 for beta, right?

@k8s-triage-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 19, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 18, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants