This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2025. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2025. It is now read-only.
Watching for more than 3 pods doesn't work #454
Description
Hello.
I found some correlation between pods count and ksync watch status.
Here is a my config:
apikey: ksync
context: "mycontext"
daemonset-namespace: kube-system
docker-root: /var/lib/docker
docker-socket: /var/run/docker.sock
log-level: info
namespace: pr-22572
output: pretty
port: 40322
syncthing-port: 8384
spec:
- name: monolith
containername: ""
pod: ""
selector:
- app=pr-22572-monolith-monolith
- ksync-role=web-shared
namespace: pr-22572
localpath: mydir/monolith
remotepath: /project
reload: true
localreadonly: false
remotereadonly: false
When I have 4 pods in deployment, 3 of them are in sync, but one is not:
### Ksync status: ###
NAME LOCAL REMOTE STATUS POD CONTAINER
-----------+----------+----------+----------+-----------------------------------------------------+------------
monolith monolith /project
watching pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-7df599c968-jllbc
watching pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-69bd84785d-lz6zl
watching pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-7df599c968-xjgpc
starting pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-69bd84785d-bxfmz
### Kubernetes pods status: ###
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-7df599c968-jllbc 1/1 Running 0 31m
pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-7df599c968-xjgpc 1/1 Running 0 5m51s
pr-22572-monolith-monolith-web-69bd84785d-bxfmz 1/1 Running 0 31m
If I set 3 pods for deployment, the synchronization works fine, and all 3 pods in watching state.
I tried to reproduce it a few times and always when I have 4 or more pods in deployment, some of them couldn't be in the watching state.
In ksync watch output I can see a lot of:
time="2020-10-02T18:08:32+03:00" level=warning msg="Get \"http://localhost:8384/rest/events?since=11585\": dial tcp [::1]:8384: connect: connection refused"
I tried to find some settings for increasing "parallelization" but didn't find it. Maybe this is some issue with GRPC?
Thanks.