Skip to content

Conversation

@julio-lopez
Copy link
Collaborator

Addresses reported security vulnerabilities in Go's standard library.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.42%. Comparing base (cb455c6) to head (48544fc).
Report is 567 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4656      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.86%   76.42%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files         470      529      +59     
  Lines       37301    40161    +2860     
==========================================
+ Hits        28299    30695    +2396     
- Misses       7071     7451     +380     
- Partials     1931     2015      +84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@julio-lopez julio-lopez added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code security labels Jun 8, 2025
@julio-lopez julio-lopez marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2025 06:14
@julio-lopez julio-lopez merged commit 77de865 into kopia:master Jun 8, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
@julio-lopez julio-lopez deleted the upgrade-go branch June 8, 2025 06:14
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rohit-BM18 Rohit-BM18 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file go Pull requests that update Go code security

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants