Conversation
This adds support for the new syntactic type aliases added in Python 3.12. A few examples: ``` type NullableStr = str | None type Pair[T] = tuple[T, T] type NullableStrPair = Pair[NullableStr] ``` msgspec now supports these type aliases, *except* in cases where the type alias is recursive. For example, the following type isn't supported: ``` type Link[T] = tuple[T, Link[T] | None] ``` The internal datastructure we use to store type information was not designed to handle recursive types like these; supporting them will require a larger refactor.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds support for the new syntactic type aliases added in Python 3.12. A few examples:
msgspec now supports these type aliases, except in cases where the type alias is recursive. For example, the following type isn't supported:
The internal datastructure we use to store type information was not designed to handle recursive types like these; supporting them will require a larger refactor.
Fixes #579.