Merged
Conversation
jart
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
| -1, 0))); | ||
| pthread_mutexattr_t attr; | ||
| unassert(!pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr)); | ||
| unassert(!pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED)); |
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice. The time for this has come, now that PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED is pretty much finally fully supported.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the course of playing with redbean I was confused about how the state
was behaving and then noticed that some stuff is maybe getting edited by
multiple processes. I tried to improve things by changing the definition
of the counter variables to be explicitly atomic. Claude assures me that
most modern Unixes support cross-process atomics, so I just went with it
on that front.
I also added some mutexes to the shared state to try to synchronize some
other things that might get written or read from workers but couldn't be
made atomic, mainly the rusage and time values. I could've probably been
less granular and just had a global shared-state lock, but I opted to be
fairly granular as a starting point.
This also reorders the resetting of the lastmeltdown timespec before the
SIGUSR2 signal is sent; hopefully this is okay.