Skip to content

Make http.Response.Status respect RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib.#159

Merged
maxatome merged 1 commit into
jarcoal:v1from
constantoine:v1
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Make http.Response.Status respect RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib.#159
maxatome merged 1 commit into
jarcoal:v1from
constantoine:v1

Conversation

@constantoine

@constantoine constantoine commented Nov 14, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Although RFC 2616 has been superseded with RFC 9110, some client implementation still rely on certain behavious regarding the Status-Line.

Now, as httpmock currently implements it, per RFC 9110#6.2-1, the "reason phrase" is actually optional, and you need only to include the status code.

Back in the days of RFC 2616#6.1, the Status-Line had to contain both the status code (eg. 200) and its textual representation (eg. OK).

Change code is directly stolen from the Go standard library.

This aims to fix #83 .

@constantoine constantoine changed the title Make http.Response.Status respect with RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib. Make http.Response.Status respect RFC 2616, like in Go stdlib. Nov 14, 2024
Comment thread response.go Outdated
@maxatome

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @constantoine, could you squash your commits please?

Although RFC 2616 has been superseded with RFC 9110, some client implementation still rely on certain behavious regarding the Status-Line.

Now, as httpmock currently implements it, per [RFC 9110#6.2-1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-6.2-1), the "reason phrase" is actually optional, and you need only to include the status code.

Back in the days of [RFC 2616](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616.html#section-6.1), per jarcoal#6.1, the Status-Line had to contain both the status code (eg. 200) and its textual representation (eg. OK).

Change code is directly stolen from the Go standard library.

Signed-off-by: Cléo Rebert <cleo.rebert@gmail.com>
@constantoine

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@maxatome I think we should be good :)

@maxatome maxatome merged commit 1ebd59a into jarcoal:v1 Nov 14, 2024
@maxatome

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks @constantoine! I hope to publish a new release soon, I work on a new feature not fully ready yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use http status number with text code instead of just the status number as a string

2 participants