Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for this! 😄 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added some test cases for align-items stretch and align-content stretch.
Issue
Current cross offset for gap is handled using crossDimLead, it can create issues for cases when lineHeight is being used to generate the height. e.g. in align-items stretch.
Approach
Removed logic to mutate the lineHeight and add cross offset using currentLead instead of crossDimLead.
P.S. I know this already existed but lineHeight is confusing word! Here it means flexLineHeight but when I hear lineHeight, i often think about text line height 😓