Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 7, 2020. It is now read-only.

WIP: test of the operator check for e2e#404

Closed
sdake wants to merge 4 commits intoistio:masterfrom
sdake:gatetest4
Closed

WIP: test of the operator check for e2e#404
sdake wants to merge 4 commits intoistio:masterfrom
sdake:gatetest4

Conversation

@sdake
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sdake sdake commented Oct 17, 2019

No description provided.

@sdake sdake requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2019 16:11
@istio-testing istio-testing added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Block merging of a PR because it isn't ready yet. label Oct 17, 2019
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Set by the Google CLA bot to indicate the author of a PR has signed the Google CLA. label Oct 17, 2019
@istio-testing istio-testing added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 17, 2019
@sdake
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sdake commented Oct 17, 2019

/test e2e_operator

@istio-testing istio-testing added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 17, 2019
@sdake
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sdake commented Oct 17, 2019

/test e2e_operator

@istio-testing istio-testing added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 17, 2019
@istio-testing
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sdake: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
gencheck_operator ad0d54f link /test gencheck_operator
e2e_operator ad0d54f link /test e2e_operator
Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ostromart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @sdake, will you be able to make progress on this? Otherwise we should find another owner since it's quite critical.

@irisdingbj irisdingbj mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2019
@sdake
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sdake commented Oct 24, 2019

@ostromart looks like @irisdingbj will take this over. Note my original work was passing in my local environment and also prow. There is some minor issue - possibly related to the usage of metallb - but possibly something else.

I'll take a look today after my morning meetings finish up.

Cheers
-steve

@sdake
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

sdake commented Oct 29, 2019

subsumed by work from @irisdingbj .

@sdake sdake closed this Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

cla: yes Set by the Google CLA bot to indicate the author of a PR has signed the Google CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Block merging of a PR because it isn't ready yet. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants