Skip to content

Remove AZ logic#6869

Merged
rshriram merged 1 commit intoistio:release-1.0from
ijsnellf:remove_az
Jul 5, 2018
Merged

Remove AZ logic#6869
rshriram merged 1 commit intoistio:release-1.0from
ijsnellf:remove_az

Conversation

@ijsnellf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ijsnellf ijsnellf commented Jul 5, 2018

Removes the majority of the AZ logic.

Removing as part of: #6049. Once this is merged, it should be easy to nuke the v1 discovery server.

@istio-testing
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ijsnellf
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: nmittler

Assign the PR to them by writing /assign @nmittler in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

binaryPath string
serviceCluster string
availabilityZone string
availabilityZone string // TODO: remove me?
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we want to remove the ability to set the AZ in pilot-agent?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. Let’s keep it.

// - consul: defaults to 'instance.Datacenter'
//
// This is used by EDS to group the endpoints by AZ and by .
// TODO: remove me?
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if we want to keep the EDS logic for something in the future

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also keep.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #6869 into release-1.0 will increase coverage by 1%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-1.0   #6869    +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage           71%     71%    +1%     
============================================
  Files              370     370            
  Lines            32031   31766   -265     
============================================
- Hits             22534   22362   -172     
+ Misses            8561    8471    -90     
+ Partials           936     933     -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pilot/pkg/model/service.go 77% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
pkg/bootstrap/bootstrap_config.go 41% <ø> (+13%) ⬆️
pilot/pkg/proxy/envoy/discovery.go 4% <ø> (+1%) ⬆️
pilot/pkg/proxy/envoy/watcher.go 59% <ø> (-3%) ⬇️
pilot/pkg/proxy/envoy/v2/debug.go 35% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
mixer/adapter/rbac/util.go 56% <0%> (-13%) ⬇️
mixer/adapter/solarwinds/metrics_handler.go 70% <0%> (-13%) ⬇️
pilot/pkg/config/memory/monitor.go 82% <0%> (-9%) ⬇️
mixer/adapter/servicecontrol/handler.go 39% <0%> (-8%) ⬇️
mixer/adapter/servicecontrol/distValueBuilder.go 85% <0%> (-7%) ⬇️
... and 21 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 32a2a81...db55533. Read the comment docs.

@rshriram rshriram merged commit bb7fc5d into istio:release-1.0 Jul 5, 2018
@ijsnellf ijsnellf deleted the remove_az branch July 6, 2018 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants