Skip to content

Conversation

@aschmahmann
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@aschmahmann aschmahmann requested a review from lidel September 11, 2025 16:15
@aschmahmann aschmahmann force-pushed the feat/auto-generated-block-router-peerids branch from aa52f08 to 953f966 Compare September 11, 2025 19:44
@parkan
Copy link

parkan commented Sep 12, 2025

given that the peerIDs are vestigial this makes a lot of sense to me; I am currently calling out to some utility code to generate them and throw away the keys, which creates unnecessary external dependencies

allowing SOMEGUY_HTTP_BLOCK_PROVIDER_PEERIDS to be passed keeps the API shape and allows users that do want to specify them to do so

(BTW I it looks like the endpoints and peerIDs, if specified, are matched to one another in the order specified, but this is not 100% clear from the docs)

explain that auto-generated peerids are placeholders for http providers,
not used for cryptographic operations
Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @parkan, added clarification for that + explicitly noted these are synthetic placeholders.

@lidel lidel merged commit e1c0826 into main Sep 14, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@lidel lidel deleted the feat/auto-generated-block-router-peerids branch September 14, 2025 13:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants