Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

• The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions
  and stakeholders linked/mentioned.

• Your contribution itself is clear (code comments, self-review for the
  rest) and in its best form. Follow the code contribution
  guidelines
  if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

• A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on
  any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high
  priority items.

• The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.

• The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.45%. Comparing base (3c70cf3) to head (01f1a83).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #815      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.46%   60.45%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         244      244              
  Lines       31097    31100       +3     
==========================================
- Hits        18803    18800       -3     
- Misses      10616    10622       +6     
  Partials     1678     1678              

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

For the CI to pass, it needs this PR as a dependency. It won't build without the ReproviderStats structure containing the right values. You would have to merge this one first.

I could update the go.mod file of the kubo PR to point to the right branch on my fork, but you'd have to undo it before merging.

Just did that, you can approve the workflows.

I could update the go.mod file of the kubo PR to point to the right branch on my fork, but you'd have to undo it before merging.

Yes, I did it in ipfs/kubo@439f2d4

@gsergey418alt I updated the logic, let me know if it works for you

@guillaumemichel Yeah, it's probably a better idea to compute NextRun when displaying the stats.