Skip to content

ci: remove x86_64 macOS#1337

Merged
kkysen merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
kkysen/remove-x86_64-macos
Aug 21, 2025
Merged

ci: remove x86_64 macOS#1337
kkysen merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
kkysen/remove-x86_64-macos

Conversation

@kkysen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kkysen kkysen commented Aug 21, 2025

GitHub is removing x86_64 macOS from GitHub Actions in September and Rust is deprecating x86_64-apple-darwin to tier 2 with host tools. This job is also usually the slowest, so it's a bottleneck as well.

GitHub is removing the free-tier of x86_64 macOS in September
and Rust is deprecating `x86_64-apple-darwin` to tier 2 with host tools.
This job is also usually the slowest, so it's a bottleneck as well.
@thedataking thedataking self-requested a review August 21, 2025 07:28
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@thedataking thedataking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can remove this runner but it doesn't really matter if we end up paying a bit for GH actions or how many minutes it takes to run.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@kkysen kkysen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can remove this runner but it doesn't really matter if we end up paying a bit for GH actions or how many minutes it takes to run.

Actually I think it'll just be fully removed and you'd have to add your own runner, which is more of a hassle.

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-07-11-upcoming-changes-to-macos-hosted-runners-macos-latest-migration-and-xcode-support-policy-updates/#macos-13-is-closing-down

@kkysen kkysen merged commit e645d39 into master Aug 21, 2025
5 checks passed
@kkysen kkysen deleted the kkysen/remove-x86_64-macos branch August 21, 2025 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants