Skip to content

Conversation

@nouralmaa
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #9970

Screenshot 2025-12-13 at 15 05 00

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.54%. Comparing base (92f23c0) to head (99e53fa).
⚠️ Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10095      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.54%   88.54%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         317      317              
  Lines       42343    42385      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        37494    37529      +35     
- Misses       4849     4856       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@holloway holloway self-requested a review December 15, 2025 04:09
Copy link
Contributor

@holloway holloway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix works for me, nice one @nouralmaa

@holloway holloway requested a review from rjsparks December 15, 2025 04:09
@rjsparks rjsparks merged commit 9a4ad72 into ietf-tools:main Dec 15, 2025
10 checks passed
@nouralmaa nouralmaa deleted the fix-datepicker-darkmode branch December 15, 2025 16:28
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

datepicker css and dt darkmode interact badly

4 participants