Skip to content

Scope of changes to random  #4

@Shimuuar

Description

@Shimuuar

This issue is quite meta. But I think it's important to understand what is going on. Is goal just to make random not terribly inefficient and use better PRNG? Is it to create new generic API for working with random numbers which could be used by most of performant generators? I hope latter is on the table since ecosystem is terribly fragmented.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions