fix(ssr): use useId for hydration and remove the need for resetServerContext (React 18+)#439
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Contributor
|
Thank you for bringing this in 😊 now I can kill my fork and get back to the main package |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you @klarstrup for opening this PR: #430. I wasn't able to edit the original PR, so I've re-opened it here.
The following is the original PR description
This fixes hydration errors of the sort:
Even with proper usage of
resetServerContext(), this error can crop up when doing sufficiently concurrent SSR.It also adds a warning for when
resetServerContextis called unnecessarily.Following the addition of React 18 support the resettable hacky increment-only IDs can be dropped in favor of the first party
useId()API (details: https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-reference.html#useid)This should not be a breaking change per se but the new IDs could result in broken snapshot tests among consumers, as indeed it did here.