I suppose this should go to the discussion section?

I hope I am doing this right.  I do not know how to put a table around the lines 13-20; please help if you are willing.

Updated title based on what you did to my other submission.

I am worried I am introducing versioning issues.

Create HIP nn: Set a Minimum Device Onboarding Fee

…inimum Device Onboarding Fees

added the math symbols and table edits

…P XX: Proportional Service Provider Rewards

…onal-Service-Provider-Rewards

I think I have all your edit requests done.

…imum-Device-Onboarding-Fees

I hope I am doing this right Valerie!

Patch3

…ouble-the-Value-of-Helium-Data-Credits

file name change, some typos, and an attempt to avoid edit requests from Valerie (as per requested changes to another HIP).

Keith rettig patch 2

original draft that was later forked.

…l-service-provider-rewards

Just noticed that preferred filename format is to have all lower case.

…m-device-onboarding-fees

Just noticed that preferred filename format is to have all lower case.

…e-value-of-helium-data-credits

Just noticed that preferred filename format is to have all lower case.

added stricter punishment for not paying the onboard fees by end of grace period.

…larity

…0-align-iot-subdao-per-packet-cost-with-per-packet-value

changed title and content as @rawrman thinks changing the cost of data credits is unacceptable.  Changing the per packet transfer cost accomplishes much of the intention of the author.