I encountered a small problem with the file names.
In my project I have templates for files with various content (C/C++, JSON, markdown, XML).
To help Eclipse select the right editor, I kept the original file extension, and inserted -liquid before the extension.
With this rule, my files are named like initialize-liquid.c, package-liquid.json etc.
However, when I tried to use a file named LICENSE-liquid, I got some errors claiming that the file is not found. I had no time to investigate, I renamed the file to LICENSE.liquid and avoided the problem.
My understanding was that the parser did not actually check if the file is present, but was directly upset by the missing extension, tried to add the default .liquid, and failed.
Could you check if this is true? If so, is this really the desired behaviour? I don't see any reasons why files without extnsions should not be accepted; if they exist they are as good as any other files.
I encountered a small problem with the file names.
In my project I have templates for files with various content (C/C++, JSON, markdown, XML).
To help Eclipse select the right editor, I kept the original file extension, and inserted
-liquidbefore the extension.With this rule, my files are named like
initialize-liquid.c,package-liquid.jsonetc.However, when I tried to use a file named
LICENSE-liquid, I got some errors claiming that the file is not found. I had no time to investigate, I renamed the file toLICENSE.liquidand avoided the problem.My understanding was that the parser did not actually check if the file is present, but was directly upset by the missing extension, tried to add the default
.liquid, and failed.Could you check if this is true? If so, is this really the desired behaviour? I don't see any reasons why files without extnsions should not be accepted; if they exist they are as good as any other files.