Merged
Conversation
mjpg-streamer doesn't work anymore with the new picam stack on bullseye based images - using the old stack for now.
Collaborator
|
All in favor of merging this for now, as it will probably be a while until either mjpg-streamer or (more likely) ustreamer are adapted to the new libcamera stack, or we have another solution stable enough for general consumption. See also the issue mentioned in #761 and in https://community.octoprint.org/t/pi-camera-on-raspberry-pi-4-works-in-terminal-but-not-in-octoprint/41078 |
Owner
|
Merged, it would be helpful if people confirm that this doesn't break something we didn't think about |
Closed
Closed
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
mjpg-streamer doesn't work anymore with the new picam stack on bullseye based images - using the old stack for now.