Skip to content

chore: confirm sequential reuse of runner in build command is safe#1404

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoalmas/chorefrom
copilot/sub-pr-1402-again
Closed

chore: confirm sequential reuse of runner in build command is safe#1404
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoalmas/chorefrom
copilot/sub-pr-1402-again

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Mar 10, 2026

Addresses a review question on whether runner (a mutable *Process) can be safely reused across the go generate and go build steps in BuildCommand.Handle.

Finding

  • Process is mutable — Env(), WithSpinner(), and all builder methods modify the struct in-place and return the same pointer.
  • The two Run() calls are sequential: each WithSpinner("…") overwrites the spinner message before its Run(), and the env vars (GOOS, GOARCH, CGO_ENABLED) set once persist across both runs as intended.
  • The interface contract restricts concurrent reuse only ("should not be reused concurrently"); sequential reuse is safe.

No code changes were required.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] WIP address feedback on adding generate flag to artisan build command chore: confirm sequential reuse of runner in build command is safe Mar 10, 2026
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl closed this Mar 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants