Confirm sequential runner reuse is safe in artisan build command#1403
Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoalmas/chorefrom
Closed
Confirm sequential runner reuse is safe in artisan build command#1403Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoalmas/chorefrom
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoalmas/chorefrom
Conversation
1 task
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix feedback on artisan build command generate flag usage
Confirm sequential runner reuse is safe in artisan build command
Mar 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses the review question on whether reusing
runneracross thego generateandgo buildsteps inHandle()is safe.Findings
runneris identical tor.process—Process.Env()mutates the receiver and returnsr, not a cloneRun()calls are strictly sequential;Run()blocks until the subprocess exitsProcesscontract documents "should not be reused concurrently" — sequential reuse is the intended patternWithSpinner()is called before eachRun(), andloading/loadingMessageare copied by value into theRunninginstance insidestart(), so later mutations to the process state cannot affect an in-flight executionCGO_ENABLED,GOOS,GOARCH) are intentionally shared between both commands via the singlerunnerNo code changes required — the implementation is correct as-is.
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.