Skip to content

Conversation

@gcf-owl-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot commented Nov 8, 2025

  • Regenerate this pull request now.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 829559857

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@178dbf3

Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis-gen/commit/fd356677b796e25291818a6e3cd4b745a40b1a67
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLXN0b3JhZ2UtY29udHJvbC8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiZmQzNTY2NzdiNzk2ZTI1MjkxODE4YTZlM2NkNGI3NDVhNDBiMWE2NyJ9

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 8, 2025

/gcbrun

@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2025 00:11
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot requested review from a team and yoshi-approver as code owners November 8, 2025 00:11
@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 6 region tags.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 8, 2025

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 10, 2025

/gcbrun

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Nov 10, 2025
@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

ddelgrosso1 commented Nov 10, 2025

Actively working on some additional processing for this PR. Marking as Do Not Merge until I have added the necessary files / logic.

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 11, 2025

/gcbrun

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 force-pushed the owl-bot-copy-packages-google-storage-control branch from e967b2f to 2649731 Compare November 14, 2025 19:31
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 14, 2025

/gcbrun

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 force-pushed the owl-bot-copy-packages-google-storage-control branch from 2649731 to 6d33537 Compare November 14, 2025 19:32
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 14, 2025

/gcbrun

@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the code to include "post processor". Running some additional tests before removing the do not merge tag.

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 17, 2025

/gcbrun

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 force-pushed the owl-bot-copy-packages-google-storage-control branch from 234c6d2 to 71515ca Compare November 18, 2025 16:10
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 18, 2025

/gcbrun

1 similar comment
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 18, 2025

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 20, 2025

/gcbrun

1 similar comment
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Nov 20, 2025

/gcbrun

leahecole
leahecole previously approved these changes Nov 20, 2025
@sofisl
Copy link
Contributor

sofisl commented Nov 20, 2025

I don't think I have any real comments on the code - not familiar with modernizing a client. However, I'd be curious if we can add any tests to utils?

Basically, I'm thinking about what will inevitably happen: one day, someday, none of us will be responsible for any of these libraries, and something here is going to break, and inevitably someone will ask, who wrote this code? do we actually need it?

I don't think it's necessary to have tests, (especially since there's system tests, technically), but I'm just thinking about how we can future proof this. Another idea is just to have lots and lots of documentation!

gcf-owl-bot bot added 2 commits December 3, 2025 18:25
PiperOrigin-RevId: 829559857

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@178dbf3

Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@fd35667
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoicGFja2FnZXMvZ29vZ2xlLXN0b3JhZ2UtY29udHJvbC8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiZmQzNTY2NzdiNzk2ZTI1MjkxODE4YTZlM2NkNGI3NDVhNDBiMWE2NyJ9
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 3, 2025

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 3, 2025

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 3, 2025

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 3, 2025

/gcbrun

Copy link

@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few nits to hopefully simplify skimming and not needing to read a full function.

leahecole
leahecole previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2025
sofisl
sofisl previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2025
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 removed the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Dec 15, 2025
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 15, 2025

/gcbrun

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 dismissed stale reviews from leahecole and sofisl via 8b2e025 December 15, 2025 15:26
@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 15, 2025

/gcbrun

Copy link

@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the additional clarifying comments.

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 15, 2025

/gcbrun

@dpebot
Copy link
Collaborator

dpebot commented Dec 15, 2025

/gcbrun

Copy link
Contributor

@feywind feywind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-approving after the nits.

@feywind feywind merged commit 9dd2f04 into main Dec 15, 2025
11 checks passed
@feywind feywind deleted the owl-bot-copy-packages-google-storage-control branch December 15, 2025 20:24
@release-please release-please bot mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants