Skip to content

🧹 chore: Make benchmarks more consistent#13

Merged
gaby merged 1 commit intomainfrom
update-benchmarks
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

🧹 chore: Make benchmarks more consistent#13
gaby merged 1 commit intomainfrom
update-benchmarks

Conversation

@gaby
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@gaby gaby commented Jan 2, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Remove declaration of variables from inside of Benchmark loops

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Benchmarks
    • Updated benchmark target to run tests 4 times for more consistent performance metrics
    • Optimized benchmark tests in decoder_test.go by simplifying time conversion and error handling
    • Improved benchmark function structure to reduce overhead during performance measurements

@gaby gaby requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 03:00
@gaby gaby requested review from ReneWerner87, efectn and sixcolors and removed request for a team January 2, 2025 03:00
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Makefile and decoder_test.go file, focusing on benchmark testing improvements. The Makefile now runs benchmarks four times using the -count=4 flag, while the decoder_test.go file undergoes several optimizations. These changes streamline benchmark tests by removing unnecessary complexity in time conversion and error handling, and aim to improve performance measurement accuracy.

Changes

File Changes
Makefile Updated benchmark command to run tests 4 times with -count=4 flag
decoder_test.go - Removed time converter registration in benchmark functions
- Simplified error handling in BenchmarkCheckRequiredFields
- Moved DurationStruct declaration outside benchmark loop

Possibly related PRs

  • gofiber/fiber#3254: Changes to the Makefile benchmark target
  • #12: Introduction of a benchmark target in the Makefile

Suggested labels

🧹 Updates

Suggested reviewers

  • sixcolors
  • ReneWerner87
  • efectn

Poem

🐰 Benchmarks dance with newfound grace,
Four times they run, a testing embrace
Complexity stripped, performance refined
In CodeRabbit's lab, efficiency designed!
Hop, hop, benchmark, measure with might! 🚀

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71a7ddd and f21bf16.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • decoder_test.go (3 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.77%. Comparing base (71a7ddd) to head (f21bf16).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #13   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.77%   87.77%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         867      867           
=======================================
  Hits          761      761           
  Misses         90       90           
  Partials       16       16
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.77% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gaby gaby merged commit 93b1ea5 into main Jan 2, 2025
@gaby gaby deleted the update-benchmarks branch January 2, 2025 03:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sixcolors sixcolors Awaiting requested review from sixcolors sixcolors is a code owner automatically assigned from gofiber/maintainers

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 Awaiting requested review from ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 is a code owner automatically assigned from gofiber/maintainers

@efectn efectn Awaiting requested review from efectn efectn is a code owner automatically assigned from gofiber/maintainers

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@gaby