🧹 chore: Add spell check CI workflow#3814
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThis PR performs documentation improvements and minor code cleanup across multiple files: grammar corrections in comments ("unmarshals" to "unmarshal"), variable naming consistency (newval to newValue), documentation wording refinements, example value updates, and typo fixes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (11)
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)**/*.go📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
docs/**📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
🧠 Learnings (6)📚 Learning: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-05-13T00:19:16.407ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-10-16T07:15:26.529ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-10-16T07:19:52.418ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583ZApplied to files:
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)req.go (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3814 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.25% 92.19% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 9734 9734
==========================================
- Hits 8980 8974 -6
- Misses 480 485 +5
- Partials 274 275 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds automated spell checking to the CI/CD pipeline using cspell. The workflow runs on pull requests and pushes to main/master branches, checking spelling across multiple file types with specialized dictionaries for different programming languages and technologies.
Key Changes:
- Adds GitHub Actions workflow for spell checking with cspell
- Configures cspell with comprehensive dictionary support for multiple languages and tools
- Sets up file type-specific spell checking rules
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
.github/workflows/spellcheck.yml |
GitHub Actions workflow configuration for running cspell on PRs and main branch pushes |
.cspell.json |
cspell configuration with dictionaries, ignore patterns, and file-specific overrides |
Added 'internal', 'go.mod', and 'go.sum' to ignorePaths and words.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 6cb5998 | Previous: 534aa88 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Compress_Levels_Parallel/Zstd_LevelDefault - B/op |
1 B/op |
0 B/op |
+∞ |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
|
@codex review |
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces automated spell checking with cspell, which is a great addition for maintaining code and documentation quality. The changes mostly consist of fixing typos and adjusting wording based on the spell checker's feedback. I've found a few instances where the grammatical corrections were incorrect and have suggested fixes. I also have a suggestion for the cspell configuration to include test files in the spell check scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Summary