Skip to content

🧹 chore: Add missing checks in Ctx tests#3670

Merged
ReneWerner87 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
2025-08-08-11-35-02
Aug 8, 2025
Merged

🧹 chore: Add missing checks in Ctx tests#3670
ReneWerner87 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
2025-08-08-11-35-02

Conversation

@gaby
Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby commented Aug 8, 2025

Summary

  • extend context tests with response content-type and size assertions
  • add coverage for missing Accept header

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 8, 2025 11:35
@gaby gaby requested a review from a team as a code owner August 8, 2025 11:35
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

The test suite for the fiber framework's context (Ctx) has been updated to include additional assertions and improved resource management. Enhancements include new test cases for the Accepts method, explicit closing of response bodies, and expanded assertions verifying response body content, headers, and content length across several test functions. Additionally, the app test for custom middleware 404 responses now verifies response headers and body content.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Ctx Test Enhancements
ctx_test.go
Added new test cases for Accepts method, improved resource cleanup by closing response bodies, and added assertions for response body content, headers, and content length in multiple tests. No changes to exported or public API.
App Middleware 404 Test Enhancements
app_test.go
Enhanced 404 middleware tests by adding assertions for Content-Type, response body content, and Content-Length headers on 404 responses for root and grouped routes. Added strconv import to support header length checks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Not applicable: The changes are limited to test enhancements and do not introduce or modify control flow logic that warrants a sequence diagram.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • 🧹 chore: Improve Accept* compliance with RFC 9110 #3548: Modifies the internal implementation of Accepts and related methods to handle multiple header values and adds new tests for multi-header scenarios; both PRs involve the Accepts method but focus on different aspects—test robustness versus header parsing logic.

Suggested reviewers

  • sixcolors
  • efectn
  • ReneWerner87

Poem

A bunny hops through fields of test,
Ensuring code is at its best.
With headers checked and bodies closed,
Each assertion neatly posed.
The fiber's strong, the context clear—
Robustness blooms, so let's all cheer!
🐇✨

Note

🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!

Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 2025-08-08-11-35-02

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've expanded the test suite for the ctx (context) package. The primary goal was to enhance test coverage for HTTP response handling, specifically verifying Content-Type and ContentLength headers, and to improve the Accepts method tests, including cases where the Accept header is absent.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Accepts Method Testing: I've added new test cases for the c.Accepts method to ensure correct behavior, particularly when the Accept header is not present in the request.
  • Comprehensive Response Header Assertions: I've introduced assertions in various ctx tests to validate the Content-Type header and ContentLength of HTTP responses, ensuring that the context correctly sets these properties.
  • Improved Test Resource Management: I've added defer resp.Body.Close() calls to several test functions to ensure that HTTP response bodies are properly closed, preventing potential resource leaks during test execution.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gaby gaby changed the title test: expand ctx tests 🧹 chore: Add missing checks in Ctx tests Aug 8, 2025
@gaby gaby added the v3 label Aug 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request expands the test suite for the context object by adding more assertions for response content type, size, and covering cases where the Accept header is missing. The changes are correct and improve test coverage. I've added one suggestion to refactor duplicated test assertion logic into a helper function to improve maintainability.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.84%. Comparing base (1569a61) to head (2b22f06).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3670   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.84%   91.84%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines       11447    11447           
=======================================
  Hits        10514    10514           
  Misses        669      669           
  Partials      264      264           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.84% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR expands test coverage for context (ctx) functionality by adding comprehensive response validation and edge case testing. The changes focus on ensuring proper handling of HTTP response metadata and improving test robustness.

Key changes:

  • Added response content-type and content-length assertions to existing tests
  • Added test coverage for missing Accept header scenarios
  • Enhanced resource cleanup with proper response body closing

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
ctx_test.go (5)

75-77: Good coverage for missing Accept header

Solid assertions verifying first-match behavior when Accept is absent.

Optional: also assert extension precedence for completeness, e.g.:

require.Equal(t, ".xml", c.Accepts(".xml", "application/json"))
require.Equal(t, "text/html", c.Accepts("text/html", ".xml"))

133-141: Close response body: prefer t.Cleanup over defer

Using t.Cleanup ensures cleanup runs even if a require fails (FailNow). Current defer is OK; this is a minor robustness tweak.

- defer func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) }()
+ t.Cleanup(func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) })

161-169: Empty-response assertions are correct; switch to t.Cleanup for body close

Behavior checks are accurate. Suggest t.Cleanup for consistency and stronger guarantees under early failure.

- defer func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) }()
+ t.Cleanup(func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) })

1802-1810: FormFile: resource hygiene + metadata checks LGTM; consider t.Cleanup

The added close + empty-body/content-type/length checks are good. Prefer t.Cleanup to run even if an assertion short-circuits the test.

- defer func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) }()
+ t.Cleanup(func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) })

1834-1841: FormValue: assertions are correct; use t.Cleanup for body close

Same nit as above; current code is fine, t.Cleanup is a small improvement.

- defer func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) }()
+ t.Cleanup(func() { require.NoError(t, resp.Body.Close()) })
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1569a61 and 56565e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ctx_test.go (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (11)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, `Context()` is being renamed to `RequestCtx()`, and `UserContext()` to `Context()` to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing `c.Context()` with `c.RequestCtx()` is appropriate to access the `fasthttp.RequestCtx`.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T15:57:10.221Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3056
File: middleware/encryptcookie/utils.go:20-23
Timestamp: 2024-07-01T03:44:03.672Z
Learning: Unit tests for key length enforcement in both `EncryptCookie` and `DecryptCookie` functions have been added to ensure robust validation and prevent potential runtime errors.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3056
File: middleware/encryptcookie/utils.go:20-23
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: Unit tests for key length enforcement in both `EncryptCookie` and `DecryptCookie` functions have been added to ensure robust validation and prevent potential runtime errors.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-07-26T21:00:12.902Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3446
File: docs/middleware/logger.md:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-05-13T00:19:16.407Z
Learning: In documentation files for the Fiber framework, code examples are often partial and don't repeat import statements that were shown in earlier examples, focusing instead on demonstrating specific usage patterns.
📚 Learning: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, `Context()` is being renamed to `RequestCtx()`, and `UserContext()` to `Context()` to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing `c.Context()` with `c.RequestCtx()` is appropriate to access the `fasthttp.RequestCtx`.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-09-25T15:57:10.221Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T15:57:10.221Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: app_test.go:893-895
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learning: In the `Test_App_ShutdownWithContext` function in `app_test.go`, the `clientDone` channel is used to synchronize the client's request completion before proceeding, eliminating the need for additional `time.Sleep` calls.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: hooks_test.go:228-228
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learning: In Go test files, prefer using the `require` methods from the `testify` package for assertions instead of manual comparisons and calls to `t.Fatal` or `t.Fatalf`.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-06-30T00:38:06.580Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3051
File: middleware/session/session.go:215-216
Timestamp: 2024-06-30T00:38:06.580Z
Learning: Parallel tests for `Session.Save` already exist in the `middleware/session/session_test.go` file, specifically in the `Test_Session_Save` and `Test_Session_Save_Expiration` functions.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-10-16T12:12:30.506Z
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3170
File: ctx_test.go:1721-1724
Timestamp: 2024-10-16T12:12:30.506Z
Learning: In the Go unit tests in `ctx_test.go`, it is acceptable to use invalid CIDR notation such as `"0.0.0.1/31junk"` for testing purposes.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.

Applied to files:

  • ctx_test.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
  • GitHub Check: Compare
  • GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, macos-13)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse
  • GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: repeated

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56565e6 and 2b22f06.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app_test.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (9)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/cache/cache_test.go:897-897
Timestamp: 2024-11-08T04:10:42.990Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, `Context()` is being renamed to `RequestCtx()`, and `UserContext()` to `Context()` to improve clarity and align with Go's context conventions.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3193
File: middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go:111-111
Timestamp: 2024-11-10T23:44:13.704Z
Learning: In the `middleware/adaptor/adaptor.go` file of the Fiber framework, when updating context handling, replacing `c.Context()` with `c.RequestCtx()` is appropriate to access the `fasthttp.RequestCtx`.
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T15:57:10.221Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go:188-193
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework tests, using `ctx.Response.Header.Cookie` may not be suitable for parsing cookies from the response header, as it requires a `*Cookie` and fills it rather than returning a string value; thus, manual parsing of the `Set-Cookie` header may be necessary.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3056
File: middleware/encryptcookie/utils.go:20-23
Timestamp: 2024-07-01T03:44:03.672Z
Learning: Unit tests for key length enforcement in both `EncryptCookie` and `DecryptCookie` functions have been added to ensure robust validation and prevent potential runtime errors.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3056
File: middleware/encryptcookie/utils.go:20-23
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: Unit tests for key length enforcement in both `EncryptCookie` and `DecryptCookie` functions have been added to ensure robust validation and prevent potential runtime errors.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-07-26T21:00:12.902Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T19:06:06.583Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.
Learnt from: gaby
PR: gofiber/fiber#3056
File: middleware/encryptcookie/utils.go:51-54
Timestamp: 2024-07-01T03:33:22.283Z
Learning: Unit tests for key length enforcement in `DecryptCookie` have been added to ensure consistency and security in the encryption processes.
📚 Learning: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learnt from: ReneWerner87
PR: gofiber/fiber#3161
File: app.go:923-932
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T07:56:21.623Z
Learning: In the Fiber framework, breaking changes are acceptable when moving from version 2 to version 3, including modifications to method signatures such as in the `Test` method in `app.go`.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-06-30T00:38:06.580Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3051
File: middleware/session/session.go:215-216
Timestamp: 2024-06-30T00:38:06.580Z
Learning: Parallel tests for `Session.Save` already exist in the `middleware/session/session_test.go` file, specifically in the `Test_Session_Save` and `Test_Session_Save_Expiration` functions.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-07-26T21:00:12.902Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#2922
File: middleware/cors/utils.go:63-71
Timestamp: 2024-07-26T21:00:12.902Z
Learning: The project uses the testify/assert package for assertions in unit tests.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: app_test.go:893-895
Timestamp: 2024-11-29T12:37:27.581Z
Learning: In the `Test_App_ShutdownWithContext` function in `app_test.go`, the `clientDone` channel is used to synchronize the client's request completion before proceeding, eliminating the need for additional `time.Sleep` calls.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learnt from: efectn
PR: gofiber/fiber#3162
File: hooks_test.go:228-228
Timestamp: 2024-12-13T08:14:22.851Z
Learning: In Go test files, prefer using the `require` methods from the `testify` package for assertions instead of manual comparisons and calls to `t.Fatal` or `t.Fatalf`.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-09-25T17:09:03.756Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/middleware_test.go:400-407
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T17:09:03.756Z
Learning: In the `Test_Session_Next` function in `middleware/session/middleware_test.go`, the variable `doNext` is properly synchronized with the `muNext` mutex for both read and write access.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/store.go:164-167
Timestamp: 2024-10-02T23:03:31.727Z
Learning: Unit tests in this project use testify require.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
📚 Learning: 2024-09-25T16:18:34.719Z
Learnt from: sixcolors
PR: gofiber/fiber#3016
File: middleware/session/config.go:122-122
Timestamp: 2024-09-25T16:18:34.719Z
Learning: In `DefaultErrorHandler(c *fiber.Ctx, err error)`, since `c` is a pointer to an interface, we need to dereference `*c` when calling interface methods like `SendStatus`.

Applied to files:

  • app_test.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Compare
  • GitHub Check: unit (1.24.x, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: repeated
  • GitHub Check: Analyse
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app_test.go (1)

23-23: Import looks good

strconv is appropriately added for the Content-Length assertion.

@gaby gaby added this to v3 Aug 8, 2025
@gaby gaby added this to the v3 milestone Aug 8, 2025
@gaby gaby moved this to In Progress in v3 Aug 8, 2025
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit fae0860 into main Aug 8, 2025
15 checks passed
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 deleted the 2025-08-08-11-35-02 branch August 8, 2025 11:56
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in v3 Aug 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants