-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
Description
Workflows to Update
The following workflow generates reports but has a conflicting h2 header example and no explicit header-level guideline:
| Workflow File | Issues Found |
|---|---|
.github/workflows/daily-code-metrics.md |
Missing explicit header-level guideline; conflicting h2 example in embed section |
Required Changes
1. Add Explicit Header Level Instruction
In the ## Report Format → ### Discussion Structure section, add this instruction before the report template:
**Report Formatting**: Use h3 (###) or lower for all headers in the report to maintain proper document hierarchy. The discussion title serves as h1, so start section headers at h3.2. Fix Conflicting h2 Example
In the "Embed in discussion report" code block (under ### Chart Upload and Embedding), the example currently shows:
## 📊 Visualizations ← ❌ h2, violates style guidelinesChange it to:
### 📊 Visualizations ← ✅ h3This removes the conflict with the main report template further down (which already correctly uses ### 📊 Visualizations).
Context
The other active reporting workflows (daily-file-diet, ci-coach, cli-consistency-checker, repository-quality-improver, draft-pr-cleanup, auto-triage-issues, step-name-alignment, contribution-check) all include an explicit **Report Formatting**: Use h3 (###)... line. daily-code-metrics.md is the one exception.
Design Principles (Airbnb-Inspired)
Updated workflows create reports that:
- Build trust through clarity: Important info at h3+ keeps document hierarchy intact
- Maintain consistency: Same formatting patterns as all other reporting workflows
References: §22671867548
Generated by Workflow Normalizer · ◷
- expires on Mar 5, 2026, 1:47 PM UTC