Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1947 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.35% 98.34% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 151 151
Lines 9414 9450 +36
==========================================
+ Hits 9259 9294 +35
- Misses 155 156 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
st0012
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This also feel like an independent change to me so can base on master directly.
Can we add test case to clarify the precedence of Scope and Transaction's contexts, likely in sentry_spec.rb or hub_spec.rb?
|
@st0012 regarding the based on master, I'll merge them in order so they'll each get their updated base as master. |
f2d6d71 to
e863e25
Compare
|
IMO, all of these PRs deserve their own commits on master and independent changlog entries (not under the telemetry one) because 1) they're self-contained and 2) they also affect people who don't use |
|
I will move the changelog entries, but the history will be clear, I don't want to re-create all these branches. |
7fedc8e to
9ed5e42
Compare
st0012
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems to be mixed with other PRs' changes?
e863e25 to
85d1c67
Compare
|
@st0012 it needed a merge, done now |
contextsto be set on the transaction directlyTransaction#set_nameapi to set name on transaction directlysentry-traceregex logic intoTransaction.extract_sentry_tracehelper for reusability