The addition of validation for readOnly #599 has caused issues for our existing clients when calling our API.
Especially in the flow where a user does a put update, they end up incidentally sending readOnly parameters to the API.
x = GetX
x.Value = "updated"
UpdateX(x)
Ideally I think the readOnly validation should be optional with a configuration option.
Would you be open to this change if we were to raise a PR to implement it?
The addition of validation for readOnly #599 has caused issues for our existing clients when calling our API.
Especially in the flow where a user does a put update, they end up incidentally sending readOnly parameters to the API.
Ideally I think the readOnly validation should be optional with a configuration option.
Would you be open to this change if we were to raise a PR to implement it?