Add non root user to Dockerfiles#11028
Merged
mo3rfan merged 3 commits intogeosolutions-it:masterfrom May 6, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Setting a custom user may not be ideal here for postgis but specifying postgres instead of root works as that's already created.
randomorder
approved these changes
May 5, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Runs the containers as non root user by default while also giving the user the ability to configure UID, GID and username of the user. Any mounted path that will be used will also need to be chown-ed by this user.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
Issue
What is the current behavior?
Fixes #11027
What is the new behavior?
Tomcat process runs as the custom UID. (by default 1001)
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information