Skip to content

BGDIDIC-2749: poc with a master tileset for the vegetation#759

Merged
rebert merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
data-BGDIDIC-2749-poc-master-tileset
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

BGDIDIC-2749: poc with a master tileset for the vegetation#759
rebert merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
data-BGDIDIC-2749-poc-master-tileset

Conversation

@rebert
Copy link
Contributor

@rebert rebert commented Apr 3, 2024

@github-actions github-actions bot added the data-integration This issue/pr is related to data integration work label Apr 3, 2024
@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Passing run #1782 ↗︎

0 162 19 0 Flakiness 0

Details:

BGDIDIC-2749: update vegetation, no shadow, later time
Project: web-mapviewer Commit: d25dc98132
Status: Passed Duration: 04:15 💡
Started: Apr 18, 2024 9:00 AM Ended: Apr 18, 2024 9:04 AM

Review all test suite changes for PR #759 ↗︎

@rebert rebert force-pushed the data-BGDIDIC-2749-poc-master-tileset branch 3 times, most recently from cf8de03 to 1a9bab5 Compare April 17, 2024 07:27
@rebert rebert marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2024 08:32
@rebert rebert requested review from ltshb and pakb April 17, 2024 08:32
@rebert
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebert commented Apr 17, 2024

@here topo is happy with this configuration and they agree to go live as this. We will have to implement a 3D layer Menu with shadow slider etc. post go-live.

I need some help with the cypress tests

Comment on lines 378 to +380
// increases the LOD (Cesium will load one tile further down the zoom pyramid) => higher rez WMTS
globe.maximumScreenSpaceError = 0.5
//globe.maximumScreenSpaceError = 0.5
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better remove this as simply comment, or if it is just temporary please comment the reason of the temporary removal

@ltshb
Copy link
Contributor

ltshb commented Apr 18, 2024

@rebert this cypress test is just a flaky one that come time to time. With @LukasJoss I'm trying to understand why it is flaky to solve this annoying flakiness, but for your PR simply retrigger a build will probably solve the issue.

@rebert rebert force-pushed the data-BGDIDIC-2749-poc-master-tileset branch 2 times, most recently from 2376940 to 56044c4 Compare April 18, 2024 08:44
@rebert rebert force-pushed the data-BGDIDIC-2749-poc-master-tileset branch from 56044c4 to d25dc98 Compare April 18, 2024 08:56
@rebert rebert merged commit 7e6b2ae into develop Apr 18, 2024
@rebert rebert deleted the data-BGDIDIC-2749-poc-master-tileset branch April 18, 2024 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

data-integration This issue/pr is related to data integration work

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants