Skip to content

PB-259: Removed the loading view#666

Merged
ltshb merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
feat-PB-259-loadind-view
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

PB-259: Removed the loading view#666
ltshb merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
feat-PB-259-loadind-view

Conversation

@ltshb
Copy link
Contributor

@ltshb ltshb commented Feb 28, 2024

This will ease the startup procedure for other views. It also slightly improve
startup performance.

Test link

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Passing run #817 ↗︎

0 167 22 0 Flakiness 0

Details:

PB-295: Temporarily solve an e2e tests for catalogNodes url param
Project: web-mapviewer Commit: ec72630bc8
Status: Passed Duration: 03:43 💡
Started: Mar 1, 2024 12:49 PM Ended: Mar 1, 2024 12:52 PM

Review all test suite changes for PR #666 ↗︎

Base automatically changed from feat-PB-259-performance-menu-off to develop February 28, 2024 11:08
@ltshb ltshb force-pushed the feat-PB-259-loadind-view branch 3 times, most recently from 2a69e98 to e36ae87 Compare February 29, 2024 05:44
@ltshb ltshb requested a review from pakb February 29, 2024 05:45
@ltshb ltshb force-pushed the feat-PB-259-loadind-view branch from e36ae87 to a6798fa Compare March 1, 2024 12:27
ltshb added 4 commits March 1, 2024 13:46
This will ease the startup procedure for other views. It also slightly improve
startup performance.
The command could wait to the wrong number of layers, the topic target should
only be taken into account when no layer parameter is given.
This view is necessary to parse the parameter of the legacy parameter only
when the config is ready and we can also use it in future to display a warning
message.
This url param is currently not implemented properly, see PB-295, and this
test is wrong anyway.
@ltshb ltshb force-pushed the feat-PB-259-loadind-view branch from a6798fa to ec72630 Compare March 1, 2024 12:46
@ltshb ltshb merged commit 731bc38 into develop Mar 1, 2024
@ltshb ltshb deleted the feat-PB-259-loadind-view branch March 1, 2024 12:57
@cypress cypress bot mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants